[PATCH 12/12] Add removal of old OMAP private DMA implementation to feature removal
Tony Lindgren
tony at atomide.com
Mon Apr 23 20:17:55 EDT 2012
* Russell King <rmk+kernel at arm.linux.org.uk> [120423 09:12]:
> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel at arm.linux.org.uk>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony at atomide.com>
> ---
> Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
> index 03ca210..aec6f37 100644
> --- a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
> @@ -539,3 +539,14 @@ When: 3.6
> Why: setitimer is not returning -EFAULT if user pointer is NULL. This
> violates the spec.
> Who: Sasikantha Babu <sasikanth.v19 at gmail.com>
> +
> +----------------------------
> +
> +What: OMAP private DMA implementation
> +When: 2013
> +Why: We have a DMA engine implementation; all users should be updated
> + to use this rather than persisting with the old APIs. The old APIs
> + block merging the old DMA engine implementation into the DMA
> + engine driver.
> +Who: Russell King <linux at arm.linux.org.uk>,
> + Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar at ti.com>
> --
> 1.7.4.4
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list