[PATCH 00/13] SPEAr: Move to common clock framework

[Turquette, Mike]

On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer at pengutronix.de> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 01:45:42PM -0700, Turquette, Mike wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de> wrote:
>> > On Tuesday 17 April 2012, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> >> SPEAr now supports common clock framework. This patchset contains changes
>> >> related to this. It also contain few dependency commits for clock framework that
>> >> are earlier sent separately.
>> >>
>> >> @Mike: It would be easiest to get these through ARM-SoC tree. So, would need
>> >> your Acked-by on these patches. But firstly they must get reivewed :)
>> >
>> > We should agree on how we want to do the common clk patches for v3.5.
>> > The two options I see are either we take all the patches that Mike
>> > Acks into arm-soc, or Mike applies the patches in his own tree and
>> > submits them to arm-soc. I think either way is fine for me, but
>> > some people might feel strongly one way or another.
>>
>> I would prefer the latter (I maintain a branch and submit it).  Is
>> arm-soc still the right place for common clk patches in 3.5 and
>> beyond?  I don't mind hosting a branch for inclusion into linux-next
>> and sending a pull request to Linus.  There is nothing ARM-specific
>> about the common framework.
>
> Either way is fine with me, but it's really important that all the
> floating clock framework patches begin to materialize in a visible
> branch.

Agreed.  I've been busy the last several days with some tasks besides
common clk maintenance, but I'm going through all the patches now and
will have a -next branch up soon on git.linaro.org.

Regards,
Mike