[PATCH v2 3/4] ARM: mm: truncate memory banks to fit in 4GB space for classic MMU

[Daniel Walker]

On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 06:40:24PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:38:50AM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 05:27:30PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > While here, I propose to delete these:
> > > 
> > > arch/arm/mach-msm/board-mahimahi.c:     mi->bank[0].start = PHYS_OFFSET;
> > > arch/arm/mach-msm/board-mahimahi.c:     mi->bank[0].node = PHYS_TO_NID(PHYS_OFFSET);
> > > arch/arm/mach-msm/board-mahimahi.c:     mi->bank[0].size = (219*1024*1024);
> > > arch/arm/mach-msm/board-mahimahi.c:     mi->bank[1].start = MSM_HIGHMEM_BASE;
> > > arch/arm/mach-msm/board-mahimahi.c:     mi->bank[1].node = PHYS_TO_NID(MSM_HIGHMEM_BASE);
> > > arch/arm/mach-msm/board-mahimahi.c:     mi->bank[1].size = MSM_HIGHMEM_SIZE;
> > > arch/arm/mach-msm/board-sapphire.c:     mi->bank[0].start = PHYS_OFFSET;
> > > arch/arm/mach-msm/board-sapphire.c:     mi->bank[0].node = PHYS_TO_NID(PHYS_OFFSET);
> > > arch/arm/mach-msm/board-sapphire.c:             mi->bank[0].size = (84*1024*1024);
> > > arch/arm/mach-msm/board-sapphire.c:             mi->bank[0].size = (101*1024*1024);
> > > arch/arm/mach-msm/board-sapphire.c:             mi->bank[0].size = (101*1024*1024);
> > > 
> > > because they haven't been buildable since 7th May 2010 (that's 23 months
> > > ago), and no one has reported any build errors with them.  They're only
> > > receiving updates from other sweeps and nothing more.  This all means no
> > > one is even attempting to build this code.  It's pointless having
> > > unbuildable code in the kernel, and it's nothing more than a useless
> > > maintanence burden.
> > 
> > 
> > It can't be that hard to fix.. I'll look into cleaning it up.
> 
> What's the point of fixing code which isn't being used by anyone?  As I
> said above, it's a maintanence burden and if its not being used it needs
> to be removed.
> 

Aren't there whole are sub-architectures that don't even build ? I think
something that's a work in progress is fine, as long as someone (i.e.
me) plans to get back to it at some point.

I also said that _I_ would make it build .. So someone is going to use
it, and it is going to build.

Daniel