[PATCH v8 00/16] To use DMA generic APIs for Samsung DMA

[Kukjin Kim]

Vinod Koul wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 17:03 +0530, Jassi Brar wrote:
> > On 14 September 2011 16:47, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul at intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > >> The changelog for [PATCH v8 04/16] is misleading - we don't need any
> > >> modification for the reason mentioned in changelog. But the modification
> > >> has positive side-effect of preventing callbacks during terminate_all which
> > >> is no way understood from the changelog. So I would like to changelog
> > >> corrected.
> > > I thought change log was correct in depicting what patch does and Boojin
> > > had replied.... I will check again...
> >
> > I didn't reply because I ran out of ways to explain the same thing in
> > different words.
> I checked again the patch, change log and your comments.
> I agree with current change log, and also your observation is right but
> that is just a side effect, which IMO should be best left to developer
> to choose or not, in this case she ignored it
> 
> So no changes to this and I a ready to merge it to my next in a day or
> two...
> 
So as a note, pulled git://git.infradead.org/users/vkoul/slave-dma.git samsung_dma for other regarding dma patches in arch/arm/ samsung stuff.

If any problems, please let me know.

Thanks.

Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim at samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.