[PATCH v4 08/10] ARM: mxs: add ocotp read function

[Shawn Guo]

On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 09:33:20AM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 04:19:39PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 03:13:16PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo at freescale.com>
> > > ---
> > > Changes for v4:
> > >  - Call cpu_relax() during polling
> > > 
> > > Changes for v2:
> > >  - Add mutex locking for mxs_read_ocotp()
> > >  - Use type size_t for count and i
> > >  - Add comment for clk_enable/disable skipping
> > >  - Add ERROR bit clearing and polling step
> > > 
> > >  arch/arm/mach-mxs/Makefile              |    2 +-
> > >  arch/arm/mach-mxs/include/mach/common.h |    1 +
> > >  arch/arm/mach-mxs/ocotp.c               |   79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  3 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > >  create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-mxs/ocotp.c
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/Makefile
> > > index 39d3f9c..f23ebbd 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/Makefile
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/Makefile
> > > @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
> > >  # Common support
> > > -obj-y := clock.o devices.o gpio.o icoll.o iomux.o system.o timer.o
> > > +obj-y := clock.o devices.o gpio.o icoll.o iomux.o ocotp.o system.o timer.o
> > is it worth to make ocotp optional?  (and let evk select
> > CONFIG_MXS_OCOTP)
> 
> I think not.
> 
I thought it depends on how we think about it.  If we think that
ocotp is a block of soc and should be on every system based on
the soc, we should build it unconditional.  However, if we think
ocotp is a function that could either be used on a machine or not,
it should be built conditional, so that the machine does not use
ocotp function could save the ocotp build and the memory of
u32 ocotp_words[0x20].

-- 
Regards,
Shawn