[PATCH 4/5 v2] ARM: pxa: Fix suspend/resume array index miscalculation

Eric Miao eric.y.miao at gmail.com
Mon Jan 10 18:41:26 EST 2011


On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut at gmail.com> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut at gmail.com>
> ---
> v2: Fix loop condition as proposed by Sergei
>
>  arch/arm/mach-pxa/irq.c |    8 ++++----
>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/irq.c b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/irq.c
> index 78f0e0c..a7deff5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/irq.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/irq.c
> @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ static inline void __iomem *irq_base(int i)
>                0x40d00130,
>        };
>
> -       return (void __iomem *)io_p2v(phys_base[i >> 5]);
> +       return (void __iomem *)io_p2v(phys_base[i]);
>  }
>
>  void __init pxa_init_irq(int irq_nr, set_wake_t fn)
> @@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ void __init pxa_init_irq(int irq_nr, set_wake_t fn)
>        pxa_internal_irq_nr = irq_nr;
>
>        for (n = 0; n < irq_nr; n += 32) {
> -               void __iomem *base = irq_base(n);
> +               void __iomem *base = irq_base(n >> 5);
>
>                __raw_writel(0, base + ICMR);   /* disable all IRQs */
>                __raw_writel(0, base + ICLR);   /* all IRQs are IRQ, not FIQ */
> @@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ static int pxa_irq_suspend(struct sys_device *dev, pm_message_t state)
>  {
>        int i;
>
> -       for (i = 0; i < pxa_internal_irq_nr; i += 32) {
> +       for (i = 0; i < pxa_internal_irq_nr / 32; i++) {
>                void __iomem *base = irq_base(i);

I prefer it to be IRQ number based instead of IRQ bank based,
in other word, I'd rather to change the statement below:

>
>                saved_icmr[i] = __raw_readl(base + ICMR);

to something:

saved_icmr[i / 32] = __raw_read(base + ICMR);

> @@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ static int pxa_irq_resume(struct sys_device *dev)
>  {
>        int i;
>
> -       for (i = 0; i < pxa_internal_irq_nr; i += 32) {
> +       for (i = 0; i < pxa_internal_irq_nr / 32; i++) {
>                void __iomem *base = irq_base(i);
>
>                __raw_writel(saved_icmr[i], base + ICMR);
> --
> 1.7.2.3
>
>



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list