[PATCH 1/5] ARM: etm: Don't require clock control

Mark Brown broonie at opensource.wolfsonmicro.com
Thu Feb 3 07:45:21 EST 2011


On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 06:54:19PM -0800, Arve Hj??nnev??g wrote:
> If clk_get fail, assume the etb does not need a separate clock.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arve Hj??nnev??g <arve at android.com>

Would it not be cleaner for the affected platforms to ensure that
clk_get() does the right thing here, for example by returning a dummy
clock?  Otherwise we'll just silently carry on if we can't get a clock
we were supposed to which doesn't seem ideal.



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list