[GIT PULL] imx: gpio interrupt cleanup

Stephen Warren swarren at nvidia.com
Mon Dec 19 16:03:20 EST 2011


Jamie Iles wrote at Monday, December 19, 2011 11:16 AM:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 09:40:41AM -0800, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > Jamie Iles wrote at Monday, December 19, 2011 10:29 AM:
> > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 09:20:34AM -0800, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > > > Behalf Of Shawn Guo wrote at Thursday, December 08, 2011 7:32 AM:
> > > > > Hi Arnd and  Olof,
> > > > >
> > > > > Please consider to pull the series below.  I really should have
> > > > > Thomas' ack on Jamie's patch 'irqdomain: export irq_domain_simple_ops
> > > > > for !CONFIG_OF', and Grant's ack on patch 'gpio/mxc: adopt irq_domain
> > > > > in gpio driver'.  So this pull request is also asking comments for the
> > > > > path of these patches.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thomas, Grant,
> > > > >
> > > > > Please speak up if you do not want "your" patches to go through arm-soc
> > > > > tree.  Thanks.
> > > >
> > > > Thomas,
> > > >
> > > > I'm waiting on the following patch, since I need it to complete a patch
> > > > I'm working on:
> > > >
> > > > > Jamie Iles (1):
> > > > >       irqdomain: export irq_domain_simple_ops for !CONFIG_OF
> > > >
> > > > Can you ack it for inclusion in the arm-soc tree, or apply it, so I know
> > > > it's OK to rely on this patch in my work?
> > >
> > > Thomas has acked this and it's in Russell's tracker as 7235/1 as I have
> > > a VIC patch that uses it too.
> >
> > Ah, I missed that.
> >
> > Is it in a stable git tree anywhere, so that it can be used as a
> > dependency for my patch in the arm-soc tree? It certainly hasn't shown
> > up in today's next.
> 
> No, I'm not aware of it having been merged anywhere yet.

Russell, do you know when this might be put into git? A few people depend
on this.

There's also a note in the patch tracker that says "For the devel / 
irqchip-consolidation branch". Is that branch stable and/or does it
feed into your devel-stable branch? Olof pointed out that devel-stable
would be the best place for it in terms of usability for an arm-soc
dependency.

Thanks.

-- 
nvpublic




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list