[PATCH] serial: DCC(JTAG) serial and console emulation support

Daniel Walker dwalker at codeaurora.org
Wed Oct 6 12:40:43 EDT 2010


On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 12:22 -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, Daniel Walker wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 11:47 -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > 
> > > It is the wrong fix nevertheless.  And in this case it isn't a question 
> > > of opinion.
> > 
> > I'm not saying your wrong, I'm sure you know more about it than I do. I
> > was just letting you know why I added it .
> 
> Sure.  However it is best to _understand_ why such things may apparently 
> fix things.  In this case it would have been by accident, and the code 
> could be broken again with a different gcc version.
> 
> Adding "cc" in the clobber list is needed only when the asm code is 
> modifying the condition flags.
> 
> I'd suggest you look at the disassembly difference with and without it. 
> My guess is that the whole thing gets optimized away as there is no 
> dependencies to be dependent on, in which case the proper fix would be 
> to mark it with "volatile".

Are you saying it's not needed for either the __dcc_putchar or
__dcc_getchar ?

With __dcc_getchar() Jeff O. (who is CC'd) discovered that the assembly
was setup in a way that assumed the condition bits were not touched, but
since they did get touched we ended up missing a branch in dcc_rx_chars
for checking if "tty" is set. Since we're branching in the assembly I'm
assuming we must be setting condition bits with the mrc instruction. 

So for __dcc_getchar it seems like it for sure is need .. 

For  __dcc_putchar I add "cc" also because again we're branching, so I'm
assuming we're also setting condition bits.

Daniel


-- 
Sent by an consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora
Forum.





More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list