[PATCH 1/6] ARM: mx5: use config to define boot related addresses

Russell King - ARM Linux linux at arm.linux.org.uk
Thu Dec 9 04:00:52 EST 2010


On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 09:52:55AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hell Russell,
> 
> On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 08:44:30AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 08:04:11AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile.boot b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile.boot
> > > > index 9939a19..388d2e8 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile.boot
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile.boot
> > > > @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
> > > > -   zreladdr-y	:= 0x90008000
> > > > -params_phys-y	:= 0x90000100
> > > > -initrd_phys-y	:= 0x90800000
> > > > +   zreladdr-$(CONFIG_SOC_IMX51)	:= 0x90008000
> > > > +params_phys-$(CONFIG_SOC_IMX51)	:= 0x90000100
> > > > +initrd_phys-$(CONFIG_SOC_IMX51)	:= 0x90800000
> > > That is one of the places that is not multi-soc capable.  You can make
> > > it 66% less worse by just removing params_phys and initrd_phys.
> > 
> > Which then destroys the ability to use the bootp veneer which combines
> > a kernel and initrd.
> I am aware of that.  I think it's OK to add the assignments when they
> are needed the first time which I don't expect to happen soon if at all.

That depends who is trying to use it.  If it's someone who isn't the
original platform developer, they may give up with it if the definitions
aren't provided.



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list