Discussion request for new Samsung SoCs maintaining

Tue Sep 1 09:38:12 EDT 2009

On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 07:44:32AM -0500, Bill Gatliff wrote:
> I'm not sure I have any useful suggestion for this part.  It would have  
> been nice to have a "mach-a8" and "mach-arm11" for these situations,

A8 and ARM11 are CPU types and we already have a perfectly good
abstraction for these.  Should the Realview ARM11 end up in mach-arm11
and the Realview Cortex A8 end up in mach-a8?  Clearly, it's just
wrong.