[PATCH 0/2] Support for the Arcom Zeus SBC, #2

[Eric Miao]

On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 5:49 AM, Marc Zyngier <maz at misterjones.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 05:29:30 -0600
> Eric Miao <eric.y.miao at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Marc Zyngier <maz at misterjones.org>
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:38:53 +0800
>> > Eric Miao <eric.y.miao at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 1:29 AM, Marc Zyngier <maz at misterjones.org>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > The Arcom Zeus is a pxa270 board with a PC104 bus, vaguely
>> >> > similar to the Arcom Viper. The following patches adds support
>> >> > for most of the on-board devices (though sound and CAN are still
>> >> > missing).
>> >> >
>> >> > Patches are against PXA devel branch. Please note that they
>> >> > depend on the following patch, currently queued in Eric's fix
>> >> > branch:
>> >> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/ycmiao/pxa-linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=b2b36316626f0d6b92c3675a2aa2726efc71d146
>> >> >
>> >> > The defconfig patch has been already posted before, and can be
>> >> > found in the archives at the following address:
>> >> > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2009-November/004014.html
>> >> >
>> >> > This work started from Arcom's 2.6.16, but all bugs are of course
>> >> > mine.
>> >>
>> >> Marc,
>> >>
>> >> What's the difference of this #2 from #1 you posted earlier?
>> >
>> > #1 is based on 2.6.32-rc7. #2 is based on your PXA devel branch.
>> >
>>
>> OK, both patches look OK to me, merged into 'topic/zeus' at the moment
>> (but will finally merged into devel) since I need 'fix' branch to hit
>> the next -rc8 before I can rebase 'devel' on top of that.
>
> Thanks. For the sake of completeness, can you also add the patch that
> introduced arch/arm/configs/zeus_defconfig? It was part of the first
> batch I sent, though I can resend it if you want.
>

Applied, thanks.