[PATCH v2 2/2] Add master support to rtnl_neigh for AF_BRIDGE objects

[Thomas Graf]

On 11/15/12 at 07:08am, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
> yes, the thought there was things will still continue to work with
> just lladdr and family because lladdrs are usually unique in an
> environment.
> 
> I understand the concern, and thats why I had called this out
> explicitly in a separate patch. I have looked at adding bridge index
> in the kernel msg, and since the bridge driver uses the neighbour
> attributes, adding the master index there seemed out of place.
> 
> 
> Can this be documented ?. or made explicit some other way..maybe a
> check during cache_manager add for AF_BRIDGE. ?

OK, good enough. I'll merge this as-is.

Let's solve the cache dependencies problem separately. So far
all depdenencies have been optional and were only used for
pretty printing.

The current cache provisioning does not work well in a threaded
environment so this needs a do over anyway.