wrong nlmsg_len?
Stijn Souffriau
stijn.souffriau at essensium.com
Thu Jan 26 04:08:40 EST 2012
On 01/26/2012 10:06 AM, Thomas Graf wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 07:03:18PM +0100, Stijn Souffriau wrote:
>> [ATTR 01] 48 octets
>> 14 00 01 00 : CTA_TUPLE_IP len=20
>> 08 00 01 00 : CTA_IP_V4_SRC len=8
>> c0 a8 01 0c
>> 08 00 02 00 : CTA_IP_V4_DST len=8
>> c0 a8 01 42
>> 1c 00 02 00 : CTA_TUPLE_PROTO len=28
>> 05 00 01 00 : CTA_PROTO_NUM len=8
>> 06 00 00 00
>> 06 00 02 00 : CTA_PROTO_SRC_PORT len=8
>> da f6 00 00
>> 06 00 03 00 : CTA_PROTO_DST_PORT len=8
>> 00 50 00 00
>>
>> What and where are these 4 mysterious bytes?
> Looking at nfnl_ct_build_tuple(), those 4 bytes you cant account
> for belong to the nested attribute header CTA_TUPLE_REPLY or
> CTA_TUPLE_ORIG.
Thanks!
This message and any attachments herein are confidential, intended solely for the addressees and are SoftAtHome's ownership. Any unauthorized use or dissemination is prohibited. If you are not the intended addressee of this message, please cancel it immediately and inform the sender.
More information about the libnl
mailing list