Libical 1.0.2 Release?

[Milan Crha]

On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 17:58 -0500, Allen Winter wrote:
> I'm thinking about making a Libical 1.0.2 release.
> 

	Hi,
does it make sense to release it?

You wrote in the release notes of the 2.0.0 that it is source
compatible (though I was forced to add some includes to sources to be
able to build the project against 2.0.0), only not binary compatible,
which makes sense, due to the soname version bump. There might not be
many trouble to update to 2.0.0, apart of those already discussed here
on the list.

The thing is that the libical 2.0.0 installs libical.pc, not
libical-2.0.pc, similarly with includes and libs, thus the two versions
cannot be installed in parallel at the same prefix.

That's why I consider 1.x dead personally.
	Bye,
	Milan