[Freeassociation-devel] Move to GitHub

[Kent Sutherland]

I'm all for this. I already use the project as a submodule through git-svn, so being native to git would make things easier for me. Branches and pull requests would make change tracking significantly easier as well. Having CI would also be very nice, as it'd encourage me to write tests directly for the project. I currently have a small set of tests that I run parallel in my own project.

GitHub also has that intangible friendlier feel than SourceForge.

Kent

On May 8, 2014, at 6:25 PM, Allen Winter <winter at kde.org> wrote:

> Howdy,
> 
> I'm thinking we should migrate from Subversion at SourceForge to Git at GitHub.
> 
> I'd rather be using git than subversion.
> I'd like be able to have git feature branches where people can work on bigger features.
> 
> And a really big thing I want is CI, and GitHub projects can leverage the travis-ci.org system.
> Maybe sourceforge has a free CI system, but I can't find such a thing.
> 
> Comments about moving from SourceForget to GitHub?
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find out:
> • 3 signs your SCM is hindering your productivity
> • Requirements for releasing software faster
> • Expert tips and advice for migrating your SCM now
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/perforce
> _______________________________________________
> Freeassociation-devel mailing list
> Freeassociation-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freeassociation-devel