[LEDE-DEV] A state of network acceleration / test on Archer C7 v4

Joel Wirāmu Pauling joel at aenertia.net
Mon Jan 29 11:58:18 PST 2018


Any chance I can convince you to use netperf + FLENT for doing your
tests rather than iperf(3)?

flent.org

-Joel

On 30 January 2018 at 03:12, Michael Richardson <mcr at sandelman.ca> wrote:
>
> Laurent GUERBY <laurent at guerby.net> wrote:
>     >> So that means that you have to do the performance testing for routing
>     >> between two subnets.
>
>     > Hi,
>
>     > With wired, firewall off and using routing (no MASQUERADE, explicit LAN
>     > route added on the NUC via WAN IP):
>
> Thanks for doing this again.
> This is Openwrt/LEDE, or the stock firmware?
> I think Openwrt.
>
>     > - IPv4 590+ Mbit/s up and 690+ Mbit/s down
>     > - IPv6 270+ Mbit/s same both ways
>
>     > So without NAT/conntrack we gain about 50% on IPv4 and we're closer to
>     > line rate.
>
> I wonder why the asymmetry.
>
>     > For the record I tested without the router to check iperf3 my setup and
>     > IPv4 and IPv6 are 910+ Mbit/s both ways.
>
>     > Sincerely,
>
>     > Laurent
>
>     > PS: kernel is 4.9.77 on the archer (not 4.4, thinko in my first mail)
>     > NUC and laptop are running 4.9 debian stretch too.
>
>
> --
> ]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
> ]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network architect  [
> ]     mcr at sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lede-dev mailing list
> Lede-dev at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
>



More information about the Lede-dev mailing list