[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 0/3] Support for ldconfig on the target

Florian Fainelli f.fainelli at gmail.com
Wed Sep 21 17:16:06 PDT 2016


On 09/21/2016 12:48 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2016-09-21 20:13, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> This patch series adds support for generating valid ld.so.cache which match the
>> target architecture, without requiring a cross-compiled version of ldconfig
>> that would run on the host, nor run on the target.
>>
>> Having a proper ld.so.cache might be needed if e.g: 64-bit executable loader
>> only has /lib64 in its default search path.
> Can't we simply fix the default search path instead?
> Or is this a workaround for dealing with external toolchain braindamage?

Actually, we don't need to necessarily, the toolchain I use has all the
essential C library under sys-root/lib64 (makes sense), however, when we
do copy the external toolchain files in package/libs/toolchain/Makefile,
we use dirname against the library file to determine the base folder.

Considering that OpenWrt treats /lib and /lib64 the same way, or rather,
forces everything to go under /lib, how about we just stop using dirname
for the external toolchain libraries and just hardcode the library path
to be /lib.

Would that be more acceptable? Then we don't really need ldconfig at all.
-- 
Florian



More information about the Lede-dev mailing list