[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] kernel: drop superflous b43 patch

John Crispin john at phrozen.org
Wed Dec 21 01:42:12 PST 2016



On 21/12/2016 09:39, Jonas Gorski wrote:
> On 21 December 2016 at 09:34, John Crispin <john at phrozen.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 21/12/2016 09:31, Jonas Gorski wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 21 December 2016 at 09:21, John Crispin <john at phrozen.org> wrote:
>>>> This patch makes 3 symbols default, that get selected by the according code.
>>>>
>>>> arch/mips/bcm47xx/Kconfig:      select SSB_B43_PCI_BRIDGE if PCI
>>>> drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43legacy/Kconfig:        select SSB_B43_PCI_BRIDGE
>>>> drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/Kconfig:      select SSB_B43_PCI_BRIDGE
>>>> drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/Kconfig:      select SSB_BLOCKIO
>>>> drivers/ssb/Kconfig:config SSB_BLOCKIO
>>>> drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/Kconfig:      select BCMA_BLOCKIO
>>>
>>> Except that we don't ever enable b43 within the kernel, so they would
>>> then stay unselected.
>>>
>>> So NAK ;p
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Jonas
>>>
>>
>> ok, so this is a hack patch not applicable for usptream or will you send
>> it upstream so that we can drop it ?
> 
> This is only required if you build ssb/bcma from the kernel, but build
> b43 from kernel-backports (which can't affect the kernel config).
> Since bcm47xx/bcm53xx requires ssb/bcma built-in into the kernel we
> can't just build ssb/bcma from backports either.
> 
> So a hack patch not suitable for upstream, and rather specific for our use case.
> 
> 
> Jonas

Ok, so this is a requirement when building a kernel with a newer
compat-wireless driver. imho we could simply give the bools a prompt
instead of setting the default to y and then expalin that this is needed
when building compat-wireless drivers. i think this should be fine for
upstream ?

	John



More information about the Lede-dev mailing list