[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] odhcpd: Update to 2016-12-01 snapshot

[Karl Palsson]

John Crispin <john at phrozen.org> wrote:
> Hi Karl,
> 
> this comment is completely devoid any usefulness. let me help
> by rephrasing it to make it useful.
> 
> "Hi community,
> 
> i have noticed that it is common practice to not annotate the
> upstream changes properly in commit bumping the git hash of
> packages. i feel that it would be much better if we used some
> common pattern, such as the "git log --online" output to make
> the changes more explicit. this would make the changelog of
> trunk more readable.
> 
> b/R"
> 
> let me know if this is what you actually wanted to say. because
> it think it would be a good idea and i would support such a new
> way of bumping packages.

Sounds lovely, I appreciate your rewording, it's much clearer and
to the point than my earlier complaints. Let's hope the community
agrees!

Cheers,
Karl Palsson
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP Digital Signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/lede-dev/attachments/20161205/1d33f8ff/attachment.sig>