[PATCH v3 0/8] (kexec-tools) arm64: add kdump support

Simon Horman horms at verge.net.au
Thu Sep 29 01:39:09 PDT 2016


On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 01:18:06AM -0700, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 09:52:00AM +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 01:33:53PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > > My kernel patches of kdump suport on arm64 are currently under reviews.
> > > 
> > > This patchset is synced with them (v26 [1]) and provides necessary changes
> > > for kexec-tools. It should be applied on top of Geoff's kexec-tools patches
> > > v5[2] along with a bugfix[3].
> > > 
> > > [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-September/454588.html
> > > [2] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/kexec/2016-September/017110.html
> > > [3] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/kexec/2016-July/016664.html
> > 
> > Unfortunately patch 2 does not seem to apply cleanly any more.
> > Could you consider rebasing if you think this series is ready to be
> > applied?
> 
> Yes, I will as there will be some changes needed again due to the discussions
> on my kernel patch.
> 
> BTW, can you give me your opinion on my question, please?
> 
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/kexec/2016-September/017119.html

I'm not particularly familiar with UEFI systems but for DT something under
chosen seems to make sense.

Regarding Mark's objections to a memmap= command line parameter.
Perhaps that could be discussed further in the context that even
though it is not particularly attractive it it being used on other
architecture(s).



More information about the kexec mailing list