About the interface-specific systemd services of wpa_supplicant
tom.ty89 at gmail.com
Mon Jun 6 02:47:55 PDT 2016
Just a bit of curiousity on what I mentioned in the title. I see that
the services uses something like:
Was there a particular reason?
Also, all three of them has:
In that case, instead of:
Wouldn't it be better to do:
I find that particular useful for USB wireless adapter (which might be
removed from time to time). With that systemd won't be blocked on boot
when it tries to start a wpa_supplicant for a non-existent interface,
and I don't see any adverse effect could be caused as well.
What do you think?
More information about the Hostap