The Register's coverage of the API changes

[Nick]

On Mon, 03 Nov 2014 13:29:38 +0000
SquarePenguin <getiplayer at squarepenguin.co.uk> wrote:

> On 3 Nov 2014, at 13:15, Mark Rogers wrote:
> > worth investigating?
> 
> Probably not. It's a new installer and would therefore not be in most 
> antivirus 'approved' signature databases and so gets flagged. This
> crops up almost every time a release is made.
> 


Ahh, that explains this, 10 of 54 AV engines worrying:

https://www.virustotal.com/en-gb/file/545eb0feed368db6d13f482fec98a973bb4701e6f25dfdd5d2b5d51c147bd97c/analysis/1414883320/

The above is analysis of the current Windows installer linked from the
dp's github documentation. The sha256sum on the page match the sha256
of the file I just downloaded.

Nick