[PATCH] net/e1000: fix driver probing in the presence of two e1000 devices

Sascha Hauer s.hauer at pengutronix.de
Wed Jan 17 00:03:01 PST 2018


On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 10:03:26AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> The .id member of the struct device for the invm device is not
> initialized and so implicitly zero. This yields:
> 
> 	register_device: already registered invm0
> 
> for the second i210 during probe.
> 
> So use the parent's id to initialize the id for invm, too, as is already
> done for the corresponding e1000-nor device.
> 
> Fixes: a74b97f009c6 ("e1000: Expose i210's iNVM as a cdev")
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de>

Applied, thanks

Sascha

> ---
>  drivers/net/e1000/eeprom.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000/eeprom.c b/drivers/net/e1000/eeprom.c
> index 23fb05ec72bc..748d8afe7922 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/e1000/eeprom.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/e1000/eeprom.c
> @@ -1504,6 +1504,7 @@ int e1000_register_invm(struct e1000_hw *hw)
>  		return ret;
>  
>  	strcpy(hw->invm.dev.name, "invm");
> +	hw->invm.dev.id = hw->dev->id;
>  	hw->invm.dev.parent = hw->dev;
>  	ret = register_device(&hw->invm.dev);
>  	if (ret < 0) {
> -- 
> 2.11.0
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> barebox mailing list
> barebox at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |



More information about the barebox mailing list