[PATCH 2/7] scripts: new kwbimage manipulation tool for Marvell SoC boot images

[Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD]

On 16:06 Mon 06 May     , Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD,
> 
> On Mon, 6 May 2013 15:54:35 +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
> wrote:
> 
> > > Could you please adopt a nicer language? You are very aggressive... and
> > > at that the same time completely wrong. Your comments make it entirely
> > > clear that you haven't even read the comments at the top of file.
> > I did but still think we can handle it in C
> > 
> > and need to handle by barebox itself when flashing
> 
> The image is pushed to the target through X-modem, directly talking to
> the ROM code of the SoC. Do you want the kwboot tool to prepare the
> image? It seems to me like it makes a lot more sense to have a tool to
> prepare the image.

yes a you want to re-flash barebox itself and you will do for ddr and I do not
want to care about all of this blob stuff twht the board already known

> 
> Remember also that this tool is needed to *extract* existing images.
> And you haven't explained how you intend to do this without a proper
> userspace tool such as kwbimage.

why extract?

you generated at runtime

> 
> And by the way, the tool is a simple userspace tool written entirely in
> C, I'm not sure to see where the problem is.
> 
> Quoting Sascha, an e-mail for this thread:
> 
> """
> Anyway, what we do on i.MX doesn't really scale anymore since the more
> complicated features of the image format can't be used with C
> structures. I'm working on replacing this with a imx-image tool.
> You seem to use checksums in your images. These can't be generated
> in C or CPP anyway.
> """
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Thomas
> -- 
> Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
> Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
> development, consulting, training and support.
> http://free-electrons.com