NAND + imx53, BBT/timings?

Alexander Aring alex.aring at gmail.com
Fri Jun 14 03:02:15 EDT 2013


Hi,

On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 09:09:11AM +0200, Vanhauwaert Wouter wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I'm working on a custom design which has an imx53 and a 1GB NAND flash (Samsung k9k8g08u0d) via an 8 bit bus.
> So I added this imx_nand_platform_data structure with a .width=1, .hw_ecc=1 and .flash_bbt=1.
> The flash gets detected at startup (also loads the bootloader from it).
> 
> nand: Manufacturer ID: 0xec, Chip ID: 0xd3 (Samsung NAND 1GiB 3,3V 8-bit), page size 2048, OOB size:64 
> but then
> nand: Bad block table not found for chip 0
> nand: Bad block table not found for chip 0
> 
> etc
> 
> and when I do imx_nand_bbm, I get:
> Bad eraseblock 0 at 0x00000000
> Bad eraseblock 1 at 0x00020000
> And for the rest UnCorrectable RS-ECC errors
> 
> This is a barenew flash, so I suppose I should find a factory bad block table?
No, this is a another bad block table. [1] You need to generate the bbt.
Factories only marks block as bad(with an mark pattern).

> I'm using the barebox 2013.05.1 stable release from git
> 

You can "try" to generate a bbt when you generate a nand bad block aware
device, nand command "nand -a", then run "nandtest -t -m /dev/nand#.bb" to fill
this bbt with "current" badblocks.

I don't know if this generates a bbt for you. But give it a try, I think
it should do :/

[1] http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/tech/mtdnand/x144.html



More information about the barebox mailing list