[PATCH] ARM: OMAP5 processors support
jlu at pengutronix.de
Fri Apr 26 06:54:42 EDT 2013
On Fri, 2013-04-26 at 13:33 +0300, Uladzimir Bely wrote:
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-omap/Kconfig
> >> index 42e5f4a..0ad3864 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap/Kconfig
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap/Kconfig
> >> @@ -41,6 +41,14 @@ config ARCH_OMAP4
> >> help
> >> Say Y here if you are using Texas Instrument's OMAP4 based platform
> >> +config MACH_OMAP5_SEVM
> >> + bool "Phytec phyCORE omap5_sevm"
> >> + depends on ARCH_OMAP5
> >> + help
> >> + Say Y here if you are using Phytecs phyCORE omap5_sevm board
> >> + based on OMAP5
> >> +
> >> config MACH_PCM051
> >> bool "Phytec phyCORE pcm051"
> >> select OMAP_CLOCK_ALL
> > Isn't the OMAP5 sEVM from TI?
> This question is more complicated. We use Phytec phyCORE OMAP4 board, but
> with OMAP5 SOC installed. We used omap5_sevm with number 3777 which already
> exists in arch/arm/tools. Kernel also was compiled for this mach-type.
So the board which you use for development is not generally available.
Maybe you could call it something like "MACH_PCM049_OMAP5" or
> As I understand, new board (Phytec phyCORE OMAP5) must be added to this file
> (http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/machines/download.php) first, and barebox
> will use this updated file for this board too. Am I right? How can I add new
> board here correctly?
To request a new machine ID, use
Note that new legacy (non-Device-Tree) boards are no longer accepted
into the kernel! For DT-only boards no machine ID is needed at all.
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
More information about the barebox