[RFC] A first pass at recognizing Pandaboards

[Sascha Hauer]

On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 09:39:10AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> 
>   thoughts on the following patch?  it's certainly not the final
> result, but it at least *starts* the process of properly recognizing
> newer pandaboards, using code taking very close to verbatim out of
> u-boot.
> 
>   it's been compile-tested and appears to still work on all boards it
> did before.  i'll do a bit more testing to make sure of that, but is
> there any philosophical objection to the following as a single patch
> submission?

Nope, looks good, except for the whitespace damage between here

> +        case MIDR_CORTEX_A9_R2P10:
> +                switch (readl(CONTROL_ID_CODE)) {
> +                case OMAP4460_CONTROL_ID_CODE_ES1_1:
> +                        return OMAP4460_ES1_1;
> +                        break;
> +                case OMAP4460_CONTROL_ID_CODE_ES1_0:
> +                default:
> +                        return OMAP4460_ES1_0;
> +                        break;
> +                }
> +                break;
> +        default:
> +                return OMAP4430_SILICON_ID_INVALID;
> +                break;
>  	}

and here.

Sascha


-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |