[PATCH v2 1/2] debug_ll.h: add PUTS_LL() function

Franck JULLIEN franck.jullien at gmail.com
Tue Jul 19 09:14:03 EDT 2011


2011/7/18 Sascha Hauer <s.hauer at pengutronix.de>:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 05:06:09PM +0400, Antony Pavlov wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Antony Pavlov <antonynpavlov at gmail.com>
>
> Applied both to next.
>
> Thanks
>  Sascha
>
>> ---
>>  include/debug_ll.h |   13 +++++++++++++
>>  1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/debug_ll.h b/include/debug_ll.h
>> index e99ae7d..6b1b174 100644
>> --- a/include/debug_ll.h
>> +++ b/include/debug_ll.h
>> @@ -35,9 +35,22 @@
>>                            ch = ((v >> (i*4)) & 0xf);\
>>                            ch += (ch >= 10) ? 'a' - 10 : '0';\
>>                            PUTC_LL (ch); }})
>> +
>> +static __inline__ void PUTS_LL(char * str)
>> +{
>> +     while (*str) {
>> +             if (*str == '\n') {
>> +                     PUTC_LL('\r');
>> +             }
>> +             PUTC_LL(*str);
>> +             str++;
>> +     }
>> +}
>> +
>>  #else
>>  # define PUTC_LL(c) do {} while (0)
>>  # define PUTHEX_LL(v) do {} while (0)
>> +# define PUTS_LL(c) do {} while (0)
>>
>>  #endif
>>

Is there any reason for not using vsprintf in a printf_ll function
which would use puts_ll / putc_ll ??

Franck.


>> --
>> 1.7.5.4
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> barebox mailing list
>> barebox at lists.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
>>
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
> Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
> Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
>
> _______________________________________________
> barebox mailing list
> barebox at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
>



More information about the barebox mailing list