[PATCH 0/8] wifi: ath12k: Introduce device group abstraction

Harshitha Prem quic_hprem at quicinc.com
Tue Apr 23 21:47:03 PDT 2024



On 4/24/2024 10:09 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson at quicinc.com> writes:
> 
>>>> Depends-on:
>>>>          [PATCH 0/3] wifi: ath12k: Refactor the hardware recovery
>>>> procedures
>>>
>>> Are you referring to this patchset:
>>>
>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/?series=821155&state=*&order=date
>>>
>>> That was sent three months ago and at least I couldn't find a newer
>>> version. So I'll just drop this patchset for now without even looking at
>>> it.
>>>
>>
>> Yes, I'm stumped as well. the patch specifies:
>>> base-commit: c416602943dd36fbd13af7496430723935c867a3
>>> prerequisite-patch-id: a4d62344b11368fb7e549c03b6a31f7ba4c9e2bb
>>> prerequisite-patch-id: b4a1e18a85d8c1e337fa133c2bd2956c33b11046
>>> prerequisite-patch-id: b16edd310baa35e2500267e338f60c9a2e6594e1
>>
>> but lore is unable to find those prerequisite patch-ids, which leads me to
>> believe that they were rebased internally but never posted.
>>
>> I tried to apply the January series on top of the base-commit:
>> c416602943dd36fbd13af7496430723935c867a3 but it doesn't apply cleanly.
>>
>> So I think we need to have a rebased and updated "Refactor the hardware
>> recovery procedures" first.
> 
> Yeah, it's waste of everyone's time to submit patches like this which
> don't even apply at all due to missing dependencies. Please don't do
> that.
> 
Sure. Sorry Jeff and Kalle, My bad!. yes,the dependent patch should be 
rebased. Will respawn this series after the dependencies are at the latest.

Thanks,
Harshitha



More information about the ath12k mailing list