athk10: Poll service ready completion by default to avoid warning `failed to receive service ready completion, polling..`?
Paul Menzel
pmenzel at molgen.mpg.de
Fri Jul 25 05:15:42 PDT 2025
Dear Baochen,
Thank you for your answer.
Am 22.07.25 um 11:38 schrieb Baochen Qiang:
> On 7/22/2025 4:37 PM, Paul Menzel wrote:
>> Today, on the Intel Kaby Lake laptop Dell XPS 13 9360 with
>>
>> $ lspci -nn -s 3a:
>> 3a:00.0 Network controller [0280]: Qualcomm Atheros QCA6174 802.11ac Wireless Network Adapter [168c:003e] (rev 32)
>>
>> resuming from ACPI S3 took longer, as it sometimes does, and looking into this, I see
>> `failed to receive service ready completion, polling..` after a delay of five seconds:
>>
>> ```
>> [ 0.000000] Linux version 6.16.0-rc6-00253-g4871b7cb27f4 (build at bohemianrhapsody.molgen.mpg.de) (gcc (Debian 14.2.0-19) 14.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.44) #90 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Sat Jul 19 08:53:39 CEST 2025
>> […]
>> [ 8.588020] abreu kernel: ath10k_pci 0000:3a:00.0: qca6174 hw3.2 target 0x05030000 chip_id 0x00340aff sub 1a56:1535
>> [ 8.588372] abreu kernel: ath10k_pci 0000:3a:00.0: kconfig debug 0 debugfs 0 tracing 0 dfs 0 testmode 0
>> [ 8.588603] abreu kernel: ath10k_pci 0000:3a:00.0: firmware ver WLAN.RM.4.4.1-00309-api 6 features wowlan,ignore-otp,mfp crc32 0793bcf2
>> […]
>> [ 9.113550] Bluetooth: hci0: QCA: patch rome 0x302 build 0x3e8, firmware rome 0x302 build 0x111
>> […]
>> [41804.953487] PM: suspend entry (deep)
>> [41804.988361] Filesystems sync: 0.034 seconds
>> [41805.007216] Freezing user space processes
>> [41805.009650] Freezing user space processes completed (elapsed 0.002 seconds)
>> [41805.009663] OOM killer disabled.
>> [41805.009666] Freezing remaining freezable tasks
>> [41805.011383] Freezing remaining freezable tasks completed (elapsed 0.001 seconds)
>> [41805.011502] printk: Suspending console(s) (use no_console_suspend to debug)
>> [41805.523883] ACPI: EC: interrupt blocked
>> [41805.545779] ACPI: PM: Preparing to enter system sleep state S3
>> [41805.556040] ACPI: EC: event blocked
>> [41805.556045] ACPI: EC: EC stopped
>> [41805.556046] ACPI: PM: Saving platform NVS memory
>> [41805.559408] Disabling non-boot CPUs ...
>> [41805.562480] smpboot: CPU 3 is now offline
>> [41805.567105] smpboot: CPU 2 is now offline
>> [41805.572122] smpboot: CPU 1 is now offline
>> [41805.582034] ACPI: PM: Low-level resume complete
>> [41805.582079] ACPI: EC: EC started
>> [41805.582080] ACPI: PM: Restoring platform NVS memory
>> [41805.583986] Enabling non-boot CPUs ...
>> [41805.584009] smpboot: Booting Node 0 Processor 1 APIC 0x2
>> [41805.584734] CPU1 is up
>> [41805.584749] smpboot: Booting Node 0 Processor 2 APIC 0x1
>> [41805.585514] CPU2 is up
>> [41805.585530] smpboot: Booting Node 0 Processor 3 APIC 0x3
>> [41805.586216] CPU3 is up
>> [41805.589070] ACPI: PM: Waking up from system sleep state S3
>> [41805.623652] ACPI: EC: interrupt unblocked
>> [41805.640074] ACPI: EC: event unblocked
>> [41805.651951] nvme nvme0: 4/0/0 default/read/poll queues
>> [41805.865391] atkbd serio0: Failed to deactivate keyboard on isa0060/serio0
>> [41810.933639] ath10k_pci 0000:3a:00.0: failed to receive service ready completion, polling..
>> [41810.933769] ath10k_pci 0000:3a:00.0: service ready completion received, continuing normally
>> [41810.986330] OOM killer enabled.
>> [41810.986332] Restarting tasks: Starting
>> […]
>> ```
>>
>> Commit e57b7d62a1b2 (wifi: ath10k: poll service ready message before failing) [1][2],
>> present since Linux v6.10-rc1, added this to avoid the hardware not being initialized:
>>
>> time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&ar->wmi.service_ready,
>> WMI_SERVICE_READY_TIMEOUT_HZ);
>> if (!time_left) {
>> /* Sometimes the PCI HIF doesn't receive interrupt
>> * for the service ready message even if the buffer
>> * was completed. PCIe sniffer shows that it's
>> * because the corresponding CE ring doesn't fires
>> * it. Workaround here by polling CE rings once.
>> */
>> ath10k_warn(ar, "failed to receive service ready completion, polling..\n");
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < CE_COUNT; i++)
>> ath10k_hif_send_complete_check(ar, i, 1);
>>
>> time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&ar->wmi.service_ready,
>> WMI_SERVICE_READY_TIMEOUT_HZ);
>> if (!time_left) {
>> ath10k_warn(ar, "polling timed out\n");
>> return -ETIMEDOUT;
>> }
>>
>> ath10k_warn(ar, "service ready completion received, continuing normally\n");
>> }
>>
>> The comment says, it’s a hardware issue. I guess from the Qualcomm device and not the
>> board design, as it happens with several devices like James’?
>>
>> Anyway, should polling be used by default then to avoid the delay?
>
> Adding additional polling before wait seems OK to me
With the attached diff, I didn’t notice any issue on the Dell XPS 13
9360 with QCA6174.
Unrelated: The only thing I noticed is, that during boot (not resume)
the function seems to be called twice. It looks like once for Wi-Fi and
once for Bluetooth:
```
[ 35.507604] ath10k_pci 0000:3a:00.0: board_file api 2 bmi_id N/A
crc32 d2863f91
[ 35.516010] usb 1-5: New USB device found, idVendor=0c45,
idProduct=670c, bcdDevice=56.26
[ 35.516022] usb 1-5: New USB device strings: Mfr=2, Product=1,
SerialNumber=0
[ 35.516026] usb 1-5: Product: Integrated_Webcam_HD
[ 35.516029] usb 1-5: Manufacturer: CN09GTFMLOG008C8B7FWA01
[ 35.587852] ath10k_pci 0000:3a:00.0: service ready completion
received, continuing normally
[ 35.606632] ath10k_pci 0000:3a:00.0: htt-ver 3.87 wmi-op 4 htt-op 3
cal otp max-sta 32 raw 0 hwcrypto 1
[ 35.628744] mc: Linux media interface: v0.10
[ 35.651301] nvme nvme0: using unchecked data buffer
[ 35.687466] Bluetooth: Core ver 2.22
[ 35.687493] NET: Registered PF_BLUETOOTH protocol family
[ 35.687495] Bluetooth: HCI device and connection manager initialized
[ 35.687499] Bluetooth: HCI socket layer initialized
[ 35.687501] Bluetooth: L2CAP socket layer initialized
[ 35.687505] Bluetooth: SCO socket layer initialized
[ 35.696050] ath: EEPROM regdomain: 0x6c
[ 35.696055] ath: EEPROM indicates we should expect a direct regpair map
[ 35.696057] ath: Country alpha2 being used: 00
[ 35.696058] ath: Regpair used: 0x6c
[ 35.712821] ath10k_pci 0000:3a:00.0 wlp58s0: renamed from wlan0
[ 35.716790] input: ELAN Touchscreen as
/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:14.0/usb1/1-4/1-4:1.0/0003:04F3:2234.0002/input/input40
[ 35.718912] videodev: Linux video capture interface: v2.00
[ 35.719492] input: ELAN Touchscreen UNKNOWN as
/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:14.0/usb1/1-4/1-4:1.0/0003:04F3:2234.0002/input/input41
[ 35.719595] input: ELAN Touchscreen UNKNOWN as
/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:14.0/usb1/1-4/1-4:1.0/0003:04F3:2234.0002/input/input42
[ 35.720899] hid-multitouch 0003:04F3:2234.0002:
input,hiddev0,hidraw1: USB HID v1.10 Device [ELAN Touchscreen] on
usb-0000:00:14.0-4/input0
[ 35.720947] usbcore: registered new interface driver usbhid
[ 35.720949] usbhid: USB HID core driver
[ 35.812081] usbcore: registered new interface driver btusb
[ 35.815263] Bluetooth: hci0: using rampatch file:
qca/rampatch_usb_00000302.bin
[ 35.815270] Bluetooth: hci0: QCA: patch rome 0x302 build 0x3e8,
firmware rome 0x302 build 0x111
[ 36.174345] Bluetooth: hci0: using NVM file: qca/nvm_usb_00000302.bin
[ 36.199643] Bluetooth: hci0: HCI Enhanced Setup Synchronous
Connection command is advertised, but not supported.
[ 36.398657] ath10k_pci 0000:3a:00.0: service ready completion
received, continuing normally
```
>> Additionally I have two questions regarding the code:
>>
>> 1. Is `WMI_SERVICE_READY_TIMEOUT_HZ` the right value to pass to
>> `wait_for_completion_timeout(struct completion *done, unsigned long timeout)`?
>>
>> The macro is defined as:
>>
>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.h:#define WMI_SERVICE_READY_TIMEOUT_HZ (5 * HZ)
>>
>> `timeout` is supposed to be in jiffies, and `CONFIG_HZ_250=y` on my system. I wonder how
>> that amounts to five seconds on my system.
>
> HZ is defined as jiffies per second, so 5 * HZ equals 5 seconds.
>
>>
>> The timeout should probably be defined in seconds? Does the WMI specification say
>> something about this?
>>
>> 2. Is the task interruptable and should `wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout(struct
>> completion *done, unsigned long timeout)` be used?
>
> While I am not sure for now, may I ask why the question?
I was just reading up on `wait_for_completion_*()`, and so the different
variants.
Kind regards,
Paul
>> [1]: https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=e57b7d62a1b2f496caf0beba81cec3c90fad80d5
>> [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240227030409.89702-1-quic_bqiang@quicinc.com/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ath10k-poll-uninterruptible.diff
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1770 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/ath10k/attachments/20250725/d08afc69/attachment.bin>
More information about the ath10k
mailing list