[PATCH RFC v2 0/4] wifi: ath10k: support board-specific firmware overrides

[Jeff Johnson]

On 3/6/2024 6:23 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> After some thought, I'd suggest to follow approach taken by the rest
> of qcom firmware:
> put a default (accepted by non-secured hardware) firmware to SoC dir
> and then put a vendor-specific firmware into subdir. If any of such
> vendors appear, we might even implement structural fallback: first
> look into sdm845/Google/blueline, then in sdm845/Google, sdm845/ and
> finally just under hw1.0.

are there existing examples in linux-firmware?

or is the whole point being only the default firmware is in
linux-firmware and vendors would follow this pattern if they add their
own firmware?