[PATCH] wireless: remove unneeded break
Christian Lamparter
chunkeey at gmail.com
Mon Oct 19 11:14:31 EDT 2020
On 19/10/2020 17:05, trix at redhat.com wrote:
> From: Tom Rix <trix at redhat.com>
>
> A break is not needed if it is preceded by a return or goto
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix at redhat.com>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intersil/p54/eeprom.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intersil/p54/eeprom.c
> index 5bd35c147e19..3ca9d26df174 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/intersil/p54/eeprom.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intersil/p54/eeprom.c
> @@ -870,7 +870,6 @@ int p54_parse_eeprom(struct ieee80211_hw *dev, void *eeprom, int len)
> } else {
> goto good_eeprom;
> }
> - break;
Won't the compiler (gcc) now complain about a missing fallthrough annotation?
> default:
> break;
> }
Cheers,
Christian
More information about the ath10k
mailing list