[PATCH] amth10k: fix promisc handling
Kalle Valo
kvalo at qca.qualcomm.com
Thu May 21 00:40:04 PDT 2015
Adding John as this involved wireless-testing
Michal Kazior <michal.kazior at tieto.com> writes:
> On 12 May 2015 at 14:45, Michal Kazior <michal.kazior at tieto.com> wrote:
>> Patch df1404650ccb ("mac80211: remove support for
>> IFF_PROMISC") removed promiscuous flag propagation
>> to drivers.
>>
>> However the patch was designed against ath10k
>> without 548462133d98 ("ath10k: fix interrupt
>> storm").
>>
>> After merge the code drifted into being no longer
>> correct and due to monitor vdev being
>> overzealously started caused IBSS to crash on
>> 999.999.0.636 for QCA988X (this firmware revision
>> is known to have issues with monitor vdev).
>>
>> This patch keeps expectations of commit
>> 548462133d98 (i.e. reduce irq storm by not
>> enabling monitor vdev for AP) and doesn't break
>> existing (known) setups that imply promiscuous
>> mode on network interfaces.
>>
>> Contrary to what it looks like 548462133d98
>> functionality is not reverted since the intention
>> was a subset of what df1404650ccb did.
>>
>> Fixes: c17c997d5613 ("Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvalo/wireless-drivers-next")
>> Signed-off-by: Michal Kazior <michal.kazior at tieto.com>
>
> Apparently this also fixes some weird issues with qca6174 hw2.1 notably:
> - ath10k causing disconnecting of other devices in a BSS
> - random Fw crashes
>
> Both problems started to happen because c17c997d5613 enabled monitor
> vdev by default on STA interfaces. It seems that qca6174 hw2.1
> firmware has issues similar to those of qca988x 999.999.0.636
> regarding monitor vdev opration.
>
> Also, I've made a typo in the subject.
>
> I'll post v2 with subject fixed and extended commit log later.
Keep in mind that c17c997d5613 is actually from wireless-testing.git
which means that it will never go to wireless-drivers-next.git nor to
net-next.git. So the merge conflict bug is purely in
wireless-testing.git and in master branch of ath.git (but not in
ath-next branch!).
I think John should apply your v2 patch once you send it. But if you
have something which should be fixed in ath-next remember to send that
in a separate patch so that I can apply that directly to ath-next.
--
Kalle Valo
More information about the ath10k
mailing list