[PATCH] ath10k: Make HTT fill size configurable

Julian Calaby julian.calaby at gmail.com
Thu Jan 15 15:03:08 PST 2015


Hi Sujith,

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 7:43 PM, Sujith Manoharan <sujith at msujith.org> wrote:
> Kalle Valo wrote:
>> Yeah, but everyone want higher throughput (including me). So what value
>> is best in your opinion?
>
> Lower throughput has been okay for all this time, with a value
> of 16. I suppose the value can be retained to not cause regressions
> on AP135 or other platforms with a low-powered CPU. As Michal mentioned,
> this value allows AP135 to function without the watchdog rebooting
> the board.

Can we detect if this parameter is too high / low and adjust / limit
it on the fly?

Thanks,

-- 
Julian Calaby

Email: julian.calaby at gmail.com
Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/



More information about the ath10k mailing list