[PATCH] ath10k: Make HTT fill size configurable

[Kalle Valo]

Sujith Manoharan <sujith at msujith.org> writes:

> Sujith Manoharan wrote:
>> None. The default stays the same. But, it can be adjusted based
>> on the platform, if higher throughput is desired.
>
> But, anyway, this patch can be dropped. We'll change the fill level
> restriction internally, based on the customer's platform.

I'm sad to hear that, now others cannot benefit from your work.

What was wrong with my proposal? Would it help if I write an RFC patch?
Just tell me what HTT fill value I should use.

-- 
Kalle Valo