Anyone seeing tx-credits 'hang'?
Ben Greear
greearb at candelatech.com
Wed Jan 14 09:57:50 PST 2015
On 01/14/2015 01:45 AM, Michal Kazior wrote:
> On 13 January 2015 at 20:07, Ben Greear <greearb at candelatech.com> wrote:
> [...]
>>
>> I managed to get some better debug out of the firmware.
>>
>> I am having a hell of a time figuring out how the code flows through all
>> of the callbacks (in both firmware and driver), but it appears this is what happened:
>>
>> (I have instrumented transfer-id in both firmware and driver)
>>
>> firmware sent wmi message with transfer-id of 72.
>> kernel received this transfer-id
>> firmware's last send-callback transfer ID is 71.
>>
>> So, it seems that either ath10k did not do the transfer-complete logic,
>> did it incorrectly, or the firmware did not notice it was done.
>>
>> I cannot find where the transfer complete code that should be updating
>> firmware is at. If you know, can you point me to it?
>
> I think the send-callback should be called when CE is simply done
> doing it's stuff. There's no need for the other side to ack anything
> explicitly (it just needs to have a free buffer on it's side so CE can
> copy it over).
>
> Or maybe it is the HOST_IS_COPY_COMPLETE_MASK? Not really sure.
I am now guessing that some magic IRQ happens when ath10k_ce_src_ring_write_index_set()
is called.
I may have narrowed down the problem a bit further now.
I printed out the ring indexes in firmware and driver when lockup
occured. The target -> host ring ids match fine, but I notice that
it appears the firmware has pending entries in it's host -> target wmi
ring that it has not consumed.
Maybe it missed an irq or has some related race.
I'm going to try forcing a poll of the host -> target wmi queue in the
firmware when it detects no wmi keep-alive messages and see if that kicks
things back into action, and maybe see if I can find any reason for it
to not properly handle the ring in the first place.
If this works, perhaps there is a way to kick the ring from the driver
side...maybe send a wmi command (ignoring quota) that has no affect,
or something like that?
Thanks,
Ben
>
>
> Michał
>
--
Ben Greear <greearb at candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
More information about the ath10k
mailing list