[PATCH v2 0/4] ath10k: fixes

[Kalle Valo]

"Luis R. Rodriguez" <rodrigue at qca.qualcomm.com> writes:

>> I disagree. The point of linux-stable is _not_ that we send all possible
>> fixes to stable. Instead we should send fixes only which really matter
>> to users and for which we have received bug reports. I haven't yet seen
>> any fix for ath10k which should be a candidate for stable releases.
>
> You don't need to wait for an issue to happen to consider it serious,
> the description of the symptoms seem pretty bad to me, but its your
> call in the end.
>
>> If we start sending all ath10k fixes to stable it's just extra churn for
>> both Greg and people working on ath10k.
>
> I'm not asking for anything that has the word "fix" to be sent, I'm
> asking them to be reviewed for stable consideration.

I think a good rule is that we should send fixes to stable only if a
user (!= developer) has reported the problem.

-- 
Kalle Valo