wireless-regdb: Update regulatory rules for Brazil (BR) on 6GHz

[Marcos Alano]

On 26/06/2025 06:23, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 4:37 PM Marcos Alano <marcoshalano at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 26/06/2025 05:15, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 2, 2025 at 9:23 AM Marcos Alano <marcoshalano at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> The rules for Brazil were based on this normative
>>>> https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/resolucoes/2017/936-resolucao-680,
>>>> as mentioned in the comments of the entry.
>>>>
>>>> This January came out a newer normative
>>>> https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/resolucoes/2025/2001-resolucao-772,
>>>>
>>>> It allows 6GHz frequencies, so the line:
>>>> (5925 - 7125 @ 320), (12), NO-OUTDOOR, NO-IR
>>>> Should change for, at least:
>>>> (5925 - 7125 @ 320), (12), NO-OUTDOOR
>>>> The removal of NO-IR is important, since routers Wi-Fi 6E and 7 don't
>>>> work because of this outdated rule based on an outdated normative.
>>>
>>> Those are very large documents. Could you help point out which sections
>>> or comments apply to your argument?
>>
>> https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/atos-de-requisitos-tecnicos-de-gestao-do-espectro/2024/1920-ato-915:
>> in the items IX.4 and IX.5 mentions the 6GHz frequency.
> 
> This only covers point-to-point usage. You would need to modify the rules
> and add the PTP flag. Likely not what you actually want.
> 
>> https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/resolucoes/2025/2001-resolucao-772:
>> You can search for "5925-6700" to check how the allocation is done.
>> It mentions satellites, so that's why I set indoors, but maybe you
>> understand that is not necessary.
> 
> This only gives the band allocation, not the requirements for each use.
> Also, satellite communication is a different use category. We should look
> for WiFi or RLAN, or perhaps "comunicação multimídia".
> 
> The requirements I were able to find are:
> 
> https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/atos-de-certificacao-de-produtos/2021/1510-ato-1306
> 
> ChenYu

I created a v3 patch that updates the comments with the new normative 
you found, removes the NO-IR so a AP can work correctly, and changed the 
maximum power from 12 to 27, since for APs it seems to mention 30dBm, 
but I considered TPC like the other frequencies.

> 
>> Marcos.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> ChenYu
>>>
>>>> I'm no lawyer, so please if you see something different, like more
>>>> granular control in the allowed frequencies, please let us know.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> --
>>>> Marcos Alano
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> --
>> Marcos Alano
>>

-- 
Marcos Alano