From seth.forshee at canonical.com  Thu Jan 28 14:41:42 2021
From: seth.forshee at canonical.com (Seth Forshee)
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 13:41:42 -0600
Subject: [wireless-regdb] [PATCH] wireless-regdb: Update regulatory
 rules for Ukraine (UA)
In-Reply-To: <20201222192329.56983-1-illia.volochii@gmail.com>
References: <20201222191738.56240-1-illia.volochii@gmail.com>
 <20201222192329.56983-1-illia.volochii@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <YBMTdvq71TGJjbvR@ubuntu-x1>

On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 09:23:28PM +0200, Illia Volochii wrote:
> This patch is based on the latest Ukrainian norms https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0201-15#n48 and is an updated version of the one sent previously.
> 
> * Extend some frequency ranges.
> * Provide some power limits in mW to be consistent with local norms.
> * Decrease EIRP on 60 GHz band channels to 20 dbm.
> * Set wmmrule=ETSI to frequency ranges that are related to EN 301 893.
> * Permit outdoor usage of 2.4 GHz band channels.
> * Prohibit outdoor usage of some 5 GHz and 60 GHz band channels.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Illia Volochii <illia.volochii at gmail.com>
> ---
>  db.txt | 27 ++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/db.txt b/db.txt
> index c71a03a..be6edf0 100644
> --- a/db.txt
> +++ b/db.txt
> @@ -1548,21 +1548,22 @@ country TZ:
>  	(2402 - 2482 @ 40), (20)
>  	(5735 - 5835 @ 80), (30)
>  
> -# Source:
> -# #914 / 06 Sep 2007: http://www.ucrf.gov.ua/uk/doc/nkrz/1196068874
> -# #1174 / 23 Oct 2008: http://www.nkrz.gov.ua/uk/activities/ruling/1225269361
> -# (appendix 8)
> -# Listed 5GHz range is a lowest common denominator for all related
> -# rules in the referenced laws. Such a range is used because of
> -# disputable definitions there.
> +# Source: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0201-15#n48
> +# Power limit units are the same as provided in the source (i.e., mW for
> +# 2.4 and 5 GHz, dbm for 60 GHz).
> +# Although it is allowed to use up to 250 mW for some 5 GHz frequency ranges,
> +# all of them are limited to 100 mW for IEEE 802.11n and IEEE 802.11ac.
> +# 2.4 GHz band channels can be used outdoors when some requirements are met.
> +# 5 GHz band channels must be used only indoors in some cases. They are neither
> +# permitted nor denied outdoors in others.
>  country UA: DFS-ETSI
> -	(2400 - 2483.5 @ 40), (20), NO-OUTDOOR
> -	(5150 - 5250 @ 80), (20), NO-OUTDOOR, AUTO-BW
> -	(5250 - 5350 @ 80), (20), DFS, NO-OUTDOOR, AUTO-BW
> -	(5490 - 5670 @ 160), (20), DFS
> -	(5735 - 5835 @ 80), (20)
> +	(2400 - 2483.5 @ 40), (100 mW)

You mention that some conditions are required for outdoor use of this
range. One of those is TPC, which would require reducing the max EIRP to
50 mW. There's also some language about the SSID format which implies a
license might be required, but it's not entirely clear from the
translation I'm reading. Seems like it might be best to keep this at 100
mW, NO-OUTDOOR.

> +	(5150 - 5250 @ 80), (100 mW), NO-OUTDOOR, AUTO-BW, wmmrule=ETSI
> +	(5250 - 5350 @ 80), (100 mW), DFS, NO-OUTDOOR, AUTO-BW, wmmrule=ETSI
> +	(5470 - 5725 @ 160), (100 mW), DFS, NO-OUTDOOR, wmmrule=ETSI
> +	(5725 - 5850 @ 80), (100 mW), NO-OUTDOOR
>  	# 60 GHz band channels 1-4, ref: Etsi En 302 567
> -	(57000 - 66000 @ 2160), (40)
> +	(57000 - 66000 @ 2160), (20), NO-OUTDOOR

These changes all look fine to me.

Thanks,
Seth

>  
>  country UG: DFS-FCC
>  	(2402 - 2482 @ 40), (20)
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 


From seth.forshee at canonical.com  Thu Jan 28 14:43:54 2021
From: seth.forshee at canonical.com (Seth Forshee)
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 13:43:54 -0600
Subject: [wireless-regdb] [PATCH] wireless-regdb: update CNAF regulation
 url for ES
In-Reply-To: <20201229200504.6383-1-xose.vazquez@gmail.com>
References: <20201229200504.6383-1-xose.vazquez@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <YBMT+tnO8q/5AxkM@ubuntu-x1>

On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 09:05:04PM +0100, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> Cc: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee at canonical.com>
> Cc: WIRELESS ML <linux-wireless at vger.kernel.org>
> Cc: REGDB ML <wireless-regdb at lists.infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Xose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez at gmail.com>

Applied, thanks!


From illia.volochii at gmail.com  Fri Jan 29 09:49:16 2021
From: illia.volochii at gmail.com (Illia Volochii)
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 16:49:16 +0200
Subject: [wireless-regdb] [PATCH] wireless-regdb: Update regulatory
 rules for Ukraine (UA)
In-Reply-To: <YBMTdvq71TGJjbvR@ubuntu-x1>
References: <20201222191738.56240-1-illia.volochii@gmail.com>
 <20201222192329.56983-1-illia.volochii@gmail.com> <YBMTdvq71TGJjbvR@ubuntu-x1>
Message-ID: <CAGoMFrb217ey=QAfnbXVHX_YUzcfXTCdYpTVEo1DuXRuLEdetg@mail.gmail.com>

??, 28 ???. 2021 ? 21:41 Seth Forshee <seth.forshee at canonical.com> ????:
> > +     (2400 - 2483.5 @ 40), (100 mW)
>
> You mention that some conditions are required for outdoor use of this
> range. One of those is TPC, which would require reducing the max EIRP to
> 50 mW. There's also some language about the SSID format which implies a
> license might be required, but it's not entirely clear from the
> translation I'm reading. Seems like it might be best to keep this at 100
> mW, NO-OUTDOOR.

I agree.
Could you please add the flag while applying the patch? Or should I
send an updated version?

Thanks,
Illia


From seth.forshee at canonical.com  Fri Jan 29 10:00:15 2021
From: seth.forshee at canonical.com (Seth Forshee)
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 09:00:15 -0600
Subject: [wireless-regdb] [PATCH] wireless-regdb: Update regulatory
 rules for Ukraine (UA)
In-Reply-To: <CAGoMFrb217ey=QAfnbXVHX_YUzcfXTCdYpTVEo1DuXRuLEdetg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20201222191738.56240-1-illia.volochii@gmail.com>
 <20201222192329.56983-1-illia.volochii@gmail.com>
 <YBMTdvq71TGJjbvR@ubuntu-x1>
 <CAGoMFrb217ey=QAfnbXVHX_YUzcfXTCdYpTVEo1DuXRuLEdetg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <YBQi/8pEIlUdSAjQ@ubuntu-x1>

On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 04:49:16PM +0200, Illia Volochii wrote:
> ??, 28 ???. 2021 ? 21:41 Seth Forshee <seth.forshee at canonical.com> ????:
> > > +     (2400 - 2483.5 @ 40), (100 mW)
> >
> > You mention that some conditions are required for outdoor use of this
> > range. One of those is TPC, which would require reducing the max EIRP to
> > 50 mW. There's also some language about the SSID format which implies a
> > license might be required, but it's not entirely clear from the
> > translation I'm reading. Seems like it might be best to keep this at 100
> > mW, NO-OUTDOOR.
> 
> I agree.
> Could you please add the flag while applying the patch? Or should I
> send an updated version?

I can add it.

Thanks,
Seth


From seth.forshee at canonical.com  Fri Jan 29 10:03:30 2021
From: seth.forshee at canonical.com (Seth Forshee)
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 09:03:30 -0600
Subject: [wireless-regdb] [PATCH] wireless-regdb: Update regulatory
 rules for Ukraine (UA)
In-Reply-To: <20201220212721.22450-1-illia.volochii@gmail.com>
References: <20201220212721.22450-1-illia.volochii@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <YBQjwtOxRKN3NpVj@ubuntu-x1>

On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 11:27:21PM +0200, Illia Volochii wrote:
> This patch is based on the latest Ukrainian norms https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0201-15#n48.
> 
> * Extend some frequency ranges.
> * Increase EIRP of frequency ranges.
> * Set wmmrule=ETSI to frequency ranges that are related to EN 301 893.
> * Permit outdoor usage of 2.4 GHz band channels.
> * Prohibit outdoor usage of some 5 GHz band channels.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Illia Volochii <illia.volochii at gmail.com>

Applied, with the 2.4 GHz rule updated to add NO-OUTDOOR as we
discussed. Thanks!


