[wireless-regdb] wireless-regdb: Please update regulatory rules for Japan (JP) on 60GHz

b.K.il.h.u+tigbuh at gmail.com b.K.il.h.u+tigbuh at gmail.com
Thu Apr 25 15:00:22 PDT 2019


This seems to be the page for the previous standard:
https://www.arib.or.jp/english/std_tr/telecommunications/std-t74.html

And the following should be the new standard, but I don't know where
to obtain it:
https://www.arib.or.jp/english/std_tr/telecommunications/std-t117.html

The description fields here do note the range of 57-66GHz, though:
https://www.arib.or.jp/kikaku/kikaku_tushin/desc/std-t117.html
https://webstore.arib.or.jp/en/products/detail.php?product_id=288

Similar mentions in the news (search for T117):
https://www.arib.or.jp/image/osirase/news/1044.pdf
https://www.arib.or.jp/image/iinkai/kikaku-kaigi/rireki/101.pdf

Testing procedure is described here, not sure if it's considered useful:
file:///home/bkil/chrome.root/Downloads/60ghz2_1_19_4_2_1.pdf

On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 2:48 PM seth.forshee <seth.forshee at canonical.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 06:07:44PM +0800, junping.xu at jaguarwave.com wrote:
> > Hi Forsheee,
> >       The 60GHz band defined for Japan was between 59-66GHz, but is has been Updated to support 57-66Ghz about 2 years ago。
> > However, the latest wireless-regdb still containning the original regulatory information  as below. Please help to check the infomation
> > and update the regulatory.bin.
> >
> > db.txt:
> > ......
> > country JP: DFS-JP
> > (2402 - 2482 @ 40), (20)
> > (2474 - 2494 @ 20), (20), NO-OFDM
> > (4910 - 4990 @ 40), (23)
> > (5030 - 5090 @ 40), (23)
> > (5170 - 5250 @ 80), (20), AUTO-BW
> > (5250 - 5330 @ 80), (20), DFS, AUTO-BW
> > (5490 - 5710 @ 160), (23), DFS
> > # 60 GHz band channels 2-4 at 10mW,
> > # ref: http://www.arib.or.jp/english/html/overview/doc/1-STD-T74v1_1.pdf
>
> The only change which is required to change:
>
> > (59000 - 66000 @ 2160), (10 mW)
>
> to:
>
>  (57000 - 66000 @ 2160), (10 mW)
>
> Is that right? Can you provide a link to the documentation which
> supports this change? The current link above this rule appears to be
> broken.
>
> Thanks,
> Seth
>
> _______________________________________________
> wireless-regdb mailing list
> wireless-regdb at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless-regdb



More information about the wireless-regdb mailing list