[wireless-regdb] [PATCH 6/8] wireless-regdb: optimize two of DE's rules

[Johannes Berg]

On Fri, 2013-11-01 at 14:55 +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:

> -	# entry 303005
> -	(5150 - 5250 @ 80), (100 mW), NO-OUTDOOR
> -	# entries 304002 and 305002
> -	(5250 - 5350 @ 80), (100 mW), NO-OUTDOOR
> +	# entry 303005, 304002 and 305002

should probably say entries :)

Btw, according to the formal definition that the kernel uses, having two
versus one rule actually *is* different. Having two stops you from using
a channel that crosses the boundary. In practice, this kind of
interpretation is actually cumbersome and error-prone, which I've
pointed out long ago together with my suggestion to actually change it,
but I wanted to point it out anyway.

johannes