[PATCH 4/5] wcn3620: use new response format for wcn3620 trigger_ba

Bob Copeland me at bobcopeland.com
Thu Nov 19 09:41:07 PST 2015


On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 11:20:14AM +0800, yfw wrote:
> Hi Bob,
> 
> On 2015年11月10日 22:13, Bob Copeland wrote:
> >On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 03:08:53PM +0800, fengwei.yin wrote:
> >>Even on 3620, not all cmds switch to wcn36xx_smd_rsp_status_check_v2.
> >>And I don't think wcn36xx_smd_rsp_status_check_v2 should bind to 3620 (it
> >>may be related with firmware).
> >>
> >>In patch v2, the wcn36xx_smd_rsp_status_check_v2 is not bind to 3620. If
> >>you could test on none-3620 platform (I don't have none-3620 plafrom), that
> >>will be great.
> >
> >Sure, I'll take a look today or tomorrow on my hardware.
> >
> 
> Ping...

Oops, sorry.  I can confirm my hardware uses this format.

Turns out, in my backports snapshot I was already carrying a patch for it:

https://github.com/KrasnikovEugene/wcn36xx/commit/7d41270b8c3eee0f72713b4553ca047807c0a00e

-- 
Bob Copeland %% http://bobcopeland.com/



More information about the wcn36xx mailing list