About the patch work for wcn3620 by Andy

[Eugene Krasnikov]

I think in general the work is very well done by Andy! Just minor
question whether Andy can think of spliting wcn3620 logic to a
separate file what do you think Andy? The second option will be to
merge patches as it is and as soon as we have more wcn3620 specific
logic we can split it later on.

2015-05-12 10:31 GMT+01:00 yfw <fengwei.yin at linaro.org>:
> Hi Eugene,
> Thanks a lot.
>
> Regards
> Yin, Fengwei
>
>
> On 2015/5/12 14:41, Eugene Krasnikov wrote:
>>
>> Aha I missed emails somehow. Will review them today.
>>
>> 2015-05-07 13:47 GMT+01:00 yfw <fengwei.yin at linaro.org>:
>>>
>>> Hi Eugene,On 2015/5/7 20:36, Eugene Krasnikov wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Yin,
>>>>
>>>> Sorry for late reply(was on holiday). Basically we used github as our
>>>> main development tool and at some point patches migrating to linux
>>>> from github. Could you please point me to the list of patches?
>>>
>>>
>>> I meant the patches here:
>>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/wcn36xx/2015-January/001407.html
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Yin, Fengwei
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2015-05-07 8:21 GMT+01:00 yfw <fengwei.yin at linaro.org>:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2015/5/5 10:48, yfw wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi list,
>>>>>> I saw Andy posted his wcn3620 patches to the list for a while. I have
>>>>>> those
>>>>>> patches + several my patches on MTP8916 platform with kernel 4.0. And
>>>>>> they
>>>>>> work great.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So I'd like to check what's the merge plan for those patches? Is there
>>>>>> any
>>>>>> further work for patch merging? Thanks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> Yin, Fengwei
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ping Eugene.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Yin, Fengwei
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>



-- 
Best regards,
Eugene