[PATCH]Remove the PNO verion bit from the update scan param response to get the correcly response status

[Kalle Valo]

Eugene Krasnikov <k.eugene.e at gmail.com> writes:

> Let's keep function naming the same. Let's use
> wcn36xx_smd_update_scan_params_rsp instead
> wcn36xx_smd_rsp_update_scan_param_status_check. What do you think?

I agree with Eugene.

We should keep wcn36xx_smd_rsp_process() simple and have all the error
checking logic in wcn36xx_smd_update_scan_params_rsp(), otherwise the
function will end up into spaghetti code.

-- 
Kalle Valo