isochronous support broken?
Alistair John Strachan
s0348365 at sms.ed.ac.uk
Mon Jan 23 06:27:35 EST 2006
On Sunday 08 January 2006 21:48, matthieu castet wrote:
> Hi Duncan,
> Duncan Sands wrote:
> > Hi Alistair,
> > -ENOSPC This request would overcommit the usb bandwidth reserved
> > for periodic transfers (interrupt, isochronous).
> > Interesting. What kernel version is this (I noticed some bandwidth
> > changes going into 2.6.15)? Do you have other iso devices connected at
> > the same time?
> For me (eagle) with the default configuration of usbatm I use 121% of
> the bandwidht 
> I need to reduce the number of iso packet via module parameter.
Are you saying there is a parameter to help with this problem? What is it?
'No sense being pessimistic, it probably wouldn't work anyway.'
Third year Computer Science undergraduate.
1F2 55 South Clerk Street, Edinburgh, UK.
More information about the Usbatm