isochronous support broken?

[Alistair John Strachan]

On Sunday 08 January 2006 21:48, matthieu castet wrote:
> Hi Duncan,
>
> Duncan Sands wrote:
> > Hi Alistair,
> >
> >
> > -ENOSPC         This request would overcommit the usb bandwidth reserved
> >                 for periodic transfers (interrupt, isochronous).
> >
> > Interesting.  What kernel version is this (I noticed some bandwidth
> > changes going into 2.6.15)?  Do you have other iso devices connected at
> > the same time?
>
> For me (eagle) with the default configuration of usbatm I use 121% of
> the bandwidht [1]
>
> I need to reduce the number of iso packet via module parameter.

Are you saying there is a parameter to help with this problem? What is it?

-- 
Cheers,
Alistair.

'No sense being pessimistic, it probably wouldn't work anyway.'
Third year Computer Science undergraduate.
1F2 55 South Clerk Street, Edinburgh, UK.