speedtch usbatm.c,1.26,1.27

[Roman Kagan]

On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 10:11:38AM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 17:41 +0400, Roman Kagan wrote:
> > On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 09:40:25AM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote:
> > > > +		trx->urb->status = -EAGAIN;
> > > 
> > > -EAGAIN can be returned in status by the core.
> > 
> > But doesn't it mean the same thing: go back and resubmit the same data?
> 
> But is it OK to resubmit straight away [...] ?

But we don't: it's always a "soft failure" path, when we only schedule
the resumption of the processing after our throttling delay.

Cheers,
  Roman.