[linux-usb-devel] Re: [Bug 4424] New: modem speedtouch USB don't work on amd64 with kernel 2.6.12-rc1

[trem]

Hi (again)

I've discovered something quite weird.
When I boot, I don't have the connection, and I can't start it

If I remove the module speedtch and modprobe it,
I can start the connection.

I don't understand why.


Here the message I have in /var/log/messages:

when I boot:
 localhost kernel: usb 3-6.1: no stage 1 firmware found!<6>parport0: 
PC-style at 0x378 [PCSPP,TRISTATE,EPP]
 localhost modprobe: FATAL: Error inserting speedtch 
(/lib/modules/2.6.12-rc1/kernel/drivers/usb/atm/speedtch.ko): Unknown 
symbol in module, or unknown parameter (see dmesg) 

when I:  rmmod speedtch
Mar 31 21:42:25 localhost kernel: usb 3-6.1: no stage 1 firmware 
found!<4>usb 3-6.1: no stage 1 firmware found!<4>usb 3-6.1: no stage 1 
firmware found!<6>usbcore: deregistering driver speedtch

when I: modprobe speedch
Mar 31 21:42:37 localhost kernel: ADSL line is up (608 Kib/s down | 160 
Kib/s up)
Mar 31 21:42:37 localhost kernel: usbcore: registered new driver speedtch


After, a simple speedtouch_start works fine.


I hope it helps,
Philippe



Roman Kagan wrote:

>On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 09:03:11AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
>  
>
>>On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 09:50 +0200, Duncan Sands wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>I'd rather have "select".  I'm considering having it select ATM as well...
>>>I think select is more logical: if someone has this modem, it's natural
>>>that they simply choose to build the driver, and that dependencies are
>>>automatically taken care of.
>>>      
>>>
>>No, really -- it's entirely _unnatural_ that if they want to turn ATM
>>off, they can't because some random driver they don't care about has
>>_forced_ it to be on.
>>    
>>
>
>I agree on this one: if one has a USB DSL modem he can be expected to
>have enough clue to turn USB and ATM stacks on.
>
>FW_LOADER however falls into a different category, where "select" is
>IMHO more appropriate.
>
>Roman.
>
>  
>