[PATCH][RFC] usbatm.[ch]: cleanup and OAM F5 loopback

Roman Kagan rkagan at mail.ru
Sun Mar 13 03:52:26 EST 2005


On Sat, Mar 12, 2005 at 11:08:10PM +0100, Duncan Sands wrote:
> > [...] So, if the modem is busy
> > digesting previously sent urbs, you can sit and wait for more data in
> > the buffer, but if all urbs have completed you have to immediately push
> > the data to the modem.  That's how it used to work and that's how I did
> > it too, but using an atomic counter rather than an additional list.
> > Still I'm curious if it's worth the hassle, and simply flushing the
> > available data immediately is any slower.
> 
> it is probably pointless.

OK, I'll redo the patch without it and see what happens.

Roman.



More information about the Usbatm mailing list