iso support status.
matthieu castet
castet.matthieu at free.fr
Sat Jun 18 14:47:44 EDT 2005
hi Duncan,
Duncan Sands wrote:
> Hi Matthieu,
>
>
>>We plan to release a first version of ueagle-atm, and depreciate
>>eagle-usb for 2.6 kernel.
>>
>>But we'll like to have a working usbatm upstream.
>
>
> Fair enough.
>
>
>>Are you ok to implement modem quirk (mask EILSEQ status for eagle) ?
>
>
> Yes.
>
>
>>How to we should control it : module option, option control per subdriver ?
>>I like more the second, has we could have on the same machine
>>sub-drivers that need quirk and others that don't need it.
>
>
> Well, we could just always mask it. Otherwise, I suppose adding a
> flag to struct usbatm_driver would do the trick.
>
>
>>Could you find a way to select iso pipe method and have a good default
>>for buffer size ?
>>
>>There is Roman method which consist in initialised driver internal
>>before .bind call, then the modem could overwrite it if it want, and
>>then usbatm use it.
>>
>>I prefer to have and other option in usbatm_driver, as it will allow
>>static and dynamic allocation (why a modem could not support only iso
>>pipe for example ?).
>>Also it avoid that the sub-driver access private data and it much
>>cleaner (don't depend of the order of init in usbatm).
>
>
> I hope to work on iso support for the speedtouch later this week.
> I'll get back to you on this then.
>
any new about this ?
I will be busy until 21 June, but I could provide some patch if you want.
Regards
Matthieu
PS : what about my other mail about kthread killing and pending urb ?
More information about the Usbatm
mailing list